Ladies where do you like a man to bust his nut?

[pole_smoker]

For the bi and hetero women here, when you are having sex with a man where do you like him to bust his nut on your body, or in your body? IF you're lesbian and have had sex with a man feel free to answer too.

This poll is for women only. Not cross-dressers/transvestites who are men. Or completely pre-op trans women who haven't transitioned, or who never plan to ever transition.

[cbb83]

The number of results shows how dismal the female population of the site has gotten. Won't be long before this place is merged with gay.com, lol (if that's even a website, which I'm assuming it is).

[AGuyIKnow]

The number of results shows how dismal the female population of the site has gotten.
I am a bit intrigued about BareHunter45's vagina though.

[Melody Dean]

In me, preferably, but that's not always practical. If not there, then I prefer to swallow, or on my tits. Least favorite is anally, hate the cleanup.

[Annika L]

The number of results shows how dismal the female population of the site has gotten.

Well, I don't exactly think of myself as dismal, and I'm sure most of our other female members would agree.

But to me this poll demonstrates beautifully why we're so often silent and why some of us ultimately leave. "Bust his nut"?? What the fuck kind of language is that? I'll tell you. Men's locker room language. I don't complain about it on a daily basis, because for the most part it *is* guys talking to other guys. But *supposedly*, this poll is trying to solicit information from women, and yet is phrased in a way many women would consider...not offensive, exactly, but distasteful/tacky.

I'm not saying the OP should have used different language in his post/poll. Like I said, it's not offensive, and I am after all, only one person...he's free *of course* to choose his own words. But if you're genuinely interested in what adult women have to say, and in getting us to respond, then it might be worth being a hair sensitive to your target population, and not sounding like a 14-year old boy. Myself, I wouldn't answer a question phrased like this, posed by anyone. Some questions just aren't worth answering. Ask me "do you like gettin' yer cunt likked?" and I'll likely tell you to fuck off. Ask me if I enjoy cunnilingus, and I might expound more than you hoped for.

Again, I'm one person, so my views here may not reflect our seemingly dwindling female population...Melody at least seems to feel differently, for instance. I've said my piece...take it or leave it.

[chicagom]

Be happy some people show their hand early.

[onewhocares]

Well, I don't exactly think of myself as dismal, and I'm sure most of our other female members would agree.

But to me this poll demonstrates beautifully why we're so often silent and why some of us ultimately leave. "Bust his nut"?? What the fuck kind of language is that? I'll tell you. Men's locker room language. I don't complain about it on a daily basis, because for the most part it *is* guys talking to other guys. But *supposedly*, this poll is trying to solicit information from women, and yet is phrased in a way many women would consider...not offensive, exactly, but distasteful/tacky.

I'm not saying the OP should have used different language in his post/poll. Like I said, it's not offensive, and I am after all, only one person...he's free *of course* to choose his own words. But if you're genuinely interested in what adult women have to say, and in getting us to respond, then it might be worth being a hair sensitive to your target population, and not sounding like a 14-year old boy. Myself, I wouldn't answer a question phrased like this, posed by anyone. Some questions just aren't worth answering. Ask me "do you like gettin' yer cunt likked?" and I'll likely tell you to fuck off. Ask me if I enjoy cunnilingus, and I might expound more than you hoped for.

Again, I'm one person, so my views here may not reflect our seemingly dwindling female population...Melody at least seems to feel differently, for instance. I've said my piece...take it or leave it.


Thank You Annika for your well thought out and most reflective comments. The sad, but recent demise of what was a favorite site, is in fact a direct result of comments like this particular thread. Perhaps the exodus of the female members is a reflection of their intellect and integrity....some of us have been left to hold the fort.

Belle in Boston

[Realist]

Hang in there, Ladies...there seems to be a kind of cycle that swings like that pendulum we talk about. I enjoy and look forward to your input, along with some of the other more polite and respectful male members.

Don't abandon the ship, yet!

[Annika L]

Hang in there, Ladies...there seems to be a kind of cycle that swings like that pendulum we talk about. I enjoy and look forward to your input, along with some of the other more polite and respectful male members.

Don't abandon the ship, yet!

*smile* I'm not running off anywhere any time soon. Just wanted to add my voice to the question of why so few women have replied to this poll (and generally participate on the site).

[Coastocoast]

Annika I agree. I am afraid that the current situation here has turned off many of the ladies and may spell the end to the site. Look at the number of currently logged-in in members and compare it to what it was in the not too distant past. What a shame.

[ErosUrge]

Hang in there, Ladies...there seems to be a kind of cycle that swings like that pendulum we talk about. I enjoy and look forward to your input, along with some of the other more polite and respectful male members.

Don't abandon the ship, yet!

Thank you Annika for speaking up and Realist for responding to her...I haven't been to this site nearly as much as I once visited. And when I come here and see this kind of language used, it makes me wonder what has happened. Things seem so different here; or am I mistaken? Perhaps if I spent more time here I might feel differently. Or would I?
There are all sorts of reasons for me not being here as often as I once was. But I must admit when I see an OP like this one, I question what has happened.

[Melody Dean]

Again, I'm one person, so my views here may not reflect our seemingly dwindling female population...Melody at least seems to feel differently, for instance. I've said my piece...take it or leave it.

Don't take me as a good representative of the female population. While I'd prefer a bit more gentler language, I've become pretty desensitized to such terms. I also, frankly, enjoy talking about sex and personal preferences, and I like hearing others.

[Melody Dean]

Don't take me as a good representative of the female population. While I'd prefer a bit more gentler language, I've become pretty desensitized to such terms. I also, frankly, enjoy talking about sex and personal preferences, and I like hearing others.

And, the ones who can hear me talk like that (or just respond to things like that), yet still treat me like a lady, are the ones worth talking to. It's kind of a good litmus test.

[csrakate]

Well, I don't exactly think of myself as dismal, and I'm sure most of our other female members would agree.

But to me this poll demonstrates beautifully why we're so often silent and why some of us ultimately leave. "Bust his nut"?? What the fuck kind of language is that? I'll tell you. Men's locker room language. I don't complain about it on a daily basis, because for the most part it *is* guys talking to other guys. But *supposedly*, this poll is trying to solicit information from women, and yet is phrased in a way many women would consider...not offensive, exactly, but distasteful/tacky.

I'm not saying the OP should have used different language in his post/poll. Like I said, it's not offensive, and I am after all, only one person...he's free *of course* to choose his own words. But if you're genuinely interested in what adult women have to say, and in getting us to respond, then it might be worth being a hair sensitive to your target population, and not sounding like a 14-year old boy. Myself, I wouldn't answer a question phrased like this, posed by anyone. Some questions just aren't worth answering. Ask me "do you like gettin' yer cunt likked?" and I'll likely tell you to fuck off. Ask me if I enjoy cunnilingus, and I might expound more than you hoped for.

Again, I'm one person, so my views here may not reflect our seemingly dwindling female population...Melody at least seems to feel differently, for instance. I've said my piece...take it or leave it.

Beautifully said! I think you speak for many of us.

[darkeyes]

Poley is a dreadfully uncouth lout:yikes2:...... not 2 sure how often he will get his legova wiv a gel, gels:eek2:. Not ver often I wud imagine.. if eva... :tongue:

[BiBedBud]

Annika L, when you're right, you're right; and you are right. Discourse in general has gone downhill since peeps gave up pens and paper for typed and cybered messaging. Add in anonymity, and the worst of us is all too often, brought into back-lit prominence.

In pole_smoker's defence, I don't think he meant ill, he just didn't know any better. I think he does now.

[BiBedBud]

............REDACTED...................I haven't been to this site nearly as much as I once visited. And when I come here and see this kind of language used, it makes me wonder what has happened. Things seem so different here; or am I mistaken? Perhaps if I spent more time here I might feel differently. Or would I?
There are all sorts of reasons for me not being here as often as I once was. But I must admit when I see an OP like this one, I question what has happened.

I don't want to change the topic, but......

Among the things that went along with the US's post 9/11 re-interpretation of laws and the US Constitution itself, and what it was the government was going to do; the creation of 'Cyber Command' and their expolitation of 'Big Data' has inter-twined with a US Military that is now cleared for *propaganda operations* and related activities WITHIN THE US BORDERS and certainly within cyberspace. They've spent billions on this effort alone............. doing what? Nobody knows for sure (neither myself, I'll admit, but I do wonder..............)

Yeah, I know, that's a wing-nut thing to bring-up in a thread like this one, but consider: "We the People" are easier to control, when we're not in touch with each other.

The "Powers that be" DO have an interest in keeping us from talking too much amongst ourselves. Therefore, to maintain control, the government does see an interest in sowing dissension among "We the People", and that would extend to wherever we congregate, particularly in cyberspace, and particularly in places where there is large exposure to the American public.

Making this place unpalatable with a few ugly turns of phrase is an easy way to scatter some of us into the hills. That's what is most unfortunate.

I don't know this for sure, of course, in particular I don't know that the USG is behind the 'poisoning the well' scenario I suspect *might* be going on here.

I'm jus' sayin'............................


Ladies, please don't go!

[Annika L]

In pole_smoker's defence, I don't think he meant ill, he just didn't know any better. I think he does now.

I'd like to know what evidence *you* see that he now knows better.

[Gypsy_Rose]

Annika ... you bring such brilliance and logic wherever you roam. Love you bunches woman! Thank you. Well said and on point as always. Muwah.

[BiBedBud]

I'd like to know what evidence *you* see that he now knows better.

Yeah................... About that................. I guess I was wrong on that one.

You got me there.

My bad.

[BiBedBud]

Poley is a dreadfully uncouth lout:yikes2:...... not 2 sure how often he will get his legova wiv a gel, gels:eek2:. Not ver often I wud imagine.. if eva... :tongue:

Not to split hairs, here, but; when a man (even "a dreadfully uncouth lout") gets with a 'gel', it's typically the 'gel' who gets her "legova".
That is, unless she's the 'penetrative partner'.

Or, am I missing something?......................

Oh yeah, the point is that many men (though not myself) really enjoy "Pigpen Talk". The more bombastic, the better (it would seem). The problem pole_smoker seems to have while posting here, is that he can't seem to switch-over, and type with the head on his shoulders, instead of the head on the end of his staff.

That he seems driven to do it in an online community where he has been getting some push-back, speaks to the manic nature of the effort and/or the person waging it.

Like many people, I spend the bulk of my days and much of my evenings on a computer, typicaly web-connected. But, I don't have the time, energy, inclination or interest to post here on bisexual dot com as much as some people seem willing, able and all to often eager to do. I have to wonder about what (else?) is going on in someone's life, that they can literally post 50+ times a day, on bisexualdotcom, of all places. (Yeah, I know, geeks can post a lot about geeking, but that's technical/technological. Posting about sex-related stuff, so much, during the height of the 'workday' is a sure sign of underemployment, and perhaps maniacal behaviour or amphetamine abuse.)

Pole_smoker, are you cluing-in to any of this? Or are you intentionally trying to rub some of our most valued members the wrong way? If so, WTF?

Or, in general, just WTF?

WTF?


PS: I just looked over the respondents for this 'Poll' and it would seem the vast majority of respondents are male (FWIW, i.e. not much).

[darkeyes]

Yep.. but we will let it pass, bubud..:impleased

[Annika L]

And torrent rages on. Sheesh, will this guy never get bored? It just all seems so pointless. And does Drew truly not see that the intent here is to ruin the site? Can there be any other motivation? Or is Drew still on walkabout and unaware of this nonsense?

[pole_smoker]

And torrent rages on. Sheesh, will this guy never get bored? It just all seems so pointless. And does Drew truly not see that the intent here is to ruin the site? Can there be any other motivation? Or is Drew still on walkabout and unaware of this nonsense?

The only people who are "ruining the site" or who have the "intent to ruin the site", are the people who are professional complainers who wine and get all negative and critical, and who are pro-censorship yet anti-sexual freedom when they see people posting things that they personally do not like.


If you don't like a topic someone posts. Then don't click on it. There are threads here on this site I don't care to read so I don't click on them.

[Annika L]

The only people who are "ruining the site" or who have the "intent to ruin the site", are the people who are professional complainers who wine and get all negative and critical, and who are pro-censorship yet anti-sexual freedom when they see people posting things that they personally do not like.


If you don't like a topic someone posts. Then don't click on it. There are threads here on this site I don't care to read so I don't click on them.

So you maintain that you are posting 100 threads in n days in order to further sexual freedom? Interesting...and I doubt your sincerity.

The trouble is that if someone doesn't like the threads you post, they have to sift deep these days to find things you *didn't* post. And I suspect that's intentional...though why is a question I'm curious about.

But I'll plead guilty to the wine. A nice dry Chianti this time around, Gerald!

[chicagom]

No fava beans?

[tenni]

Sexual freedom is not anarchy. Repetitively asking others to disclose their sexual practices without giving a reason is not freedom as much as it is prurient behaviour.

[pole_smoker]

Sexual freedom is not anarchy. Repetitively asking others to disclose their sexual practices without giving a reason is not freedom as much as it is prurient behaviour.

Yes, and what I do is not anarchy. Just because you personally do not want to discuss what you do sexually with other people, or what you do for sex does not mean other people do not. Plus, in my polls nobody is forced to click on them, read the full thread, or vote on them if they don't want to.