0% to 100%

[truckr221]

Here is a random survey to see. What is the chance that you would contact someone with only pics of their sex organs or no pics at all ?

[truckr221]

I will post the first reply.......0%
We all need to be discreet due to work. BUT. If they found us what were they doing on here ?

[cand86]

I'd say about 25%, if they have a beautifully filled-out profile with tons of information and personality bursting through and lots of posts that let me know a bit about them. It goes down a bit if they have all that, though, and then just genital pics.

And 0% if they don't have any of the above.

[TaylorMade]

I'd say about 25%, if they have a beautifully filled-out profile with tons of information and personality bursting through and lots of posts that let me know a bit about them. It goes down a bit if they have all that, though, and then just genital pics.

And 0% if they don't have any of the above.

Actually, a couple of my favorite people do/did have just tit/cock shots when I first contacted them, BUT - - they have detailed profiles and turned out to be AWESOME people.

The rule for me is (all things being equal):

Cock/Tit shot and >2 paragraphs , they'd better be DAMN good paragraphs and they'd better be local.

Cock/Tit shot <2paragraphs, hey. . .they're proud of their tool, though I'm thinking the REALLY impressive one is the one between their ears and not their legs. . .I'll drop a short note , I don't care WHERE they're from.

*Taylor*

[diB4u]

Well if its just a picture of cock then probably no. Very clear what they are seeking, and its not really friendship and love lol...

A little bit of information is good, and if they cant for obvious reason dont want to put pic up- but they would forward one on then thats not a problem.

But naked pics only, naaa i woulndt be tempeted to do reply.

Even if the cock pics was good :rolleyes:

:tongue: wellllll......... maybe if the profile was filled out.

[Jackal]

Probably not, genitals are only as good as the person they're attached to, so if you don't tell me anything about that person I'll look elsewhere. I would hope that someone's genitals aren't the best thing about them, no matter how nice they are.

Now I never said I wouldn't look longingly at said pics, just that I wouldn't talk to their owner.

[BiDesire]

Since we enjoy sexual encounters with some substance. We’re not into let’s get together have sex and never want to see you again situations.

Cock & tit pictures only, won’t get our interest.

[Jess72]

Since I'm only here for some online entertainment, and would probably chicken out of any real life contact, I think it's better not to have any pictures at all. I have a bad habit of staring at pictures and forgetting to read everything, just skimming so my eyes can get back to the picture. This is especially true for facial shots with beautiful eyes.

[mikey3000]

A great smile and a thoughtful profile gets my attention. Cock and tit shots do nothing at all. Big deal. We all have a cock or tits. Not enough have the brains to write an intriguing paragraph or two.

One of the best lines I ever read in a profile was on how, for this guy, some of his most pleasurable experiences in his life to place mano a mano in the shower, and that's why he gets a hard on when ever it rains. Needless to say we're great friends now.

[cliffml]

I will post the first reply.......0%
We all need to be discreet due to work. BUT. If they found us what were they doing on here ?

You make an excellent point, we are all on here for either advice, friendship or sexual/relationship encounters. People don't sign up here by accident, there here because they are bi/gay/lesbian/transexual. I've recently started a relationship with a man and hopes it develops into something more serious, but if it doesn't and I decide to post looking for friends/relationship/sex I will post pics with my face along with the rest of my body.

[onewhocares]

There is NO chance of meeting if all they could muster up were shots of tits and cock. No matter how stunning the parts are it is the WHOLE person, from the inside out that make me interested....from the brain to the sense of humor. I enjoy getting to know a person as I hope they do me.

Belle

[quiet1fornow]

Probably rather no pics and great profile....ok...ok I forgot...that means 0% I guess would it be ok if I did not contact them but kept the pics?

Q:cool:

[Cherokee_Mountaincat]

Thats easy, a big fat 0%! A cock or tit shots shows me nothing of the person within. I want to be able to 'see' some intrlligence and thats what a face shot with great eyes and a winning smile is for. :} I also like to read their profiles to see how they present themselves. If they are Just looking for sex, they can keep walkin', thats not what I'm all about.
So in other words "Shoooowww me the honey, not the hiney" lol
Cat

[rissababynta]

No pics at all, I guess 50%. Depends on what they have to say.
Only genital pics, 0%

[eddy10]

This answer is based on my experience. When I had XXX pictures posted with very little verbiage I got many responses. Since I changed to my current profile, most all the inquiries dried up. So, whether they admit it or not, most folks seem to be drawn to profiles with pictures.

[texbama]

I'd say about 25%, if they have a beautifully filled-out profile with tons of information and personality bursting through and lots of posts that let me know a bit about them. It goes down a bit if they have all that, though, and then just genital pics.

And 0% if they don't have any of the above.

i totaly agree cand. i want to know that the person im sending my picture to is someone that

a) is real
b)and some that i would want to meet i real life as well.

if you couple my points with cand's its a 100% amazing answer

[FalconAngel]

We are rather particular about who we share our bed with, so the answer is 0% of us contacting a person that has just dick pics.

Same percentage if they are contacting us. Guys with only dick pics on their profile had better send a proper pic to us as well as some proper info on them if they want to get a response from us.

[TwylaTwobits]

0% on just sex organs
20% on no profile depending on if they posted in an intelligent matter about something I want to comment on.

[by~his~side]

100%
But at the same time I agree with all of the previous posters.
For those of us that spend copious amounts of time in the chat room...
Look at how many of those wonderfully entertaining, deep thinking, supportive, intelligent, self assured, funny, passionate, open minded chatters are minus the exact criteria mentioned in the requirements for a contact to occur. I can think of 3 extremely popular chatters right off the bat who have pictures of just their packages/bodies (although one does allow us the pleasure of his facial pic for a quick 30 seconds or so :tong:).
And I can even top that by saying I've befriended some with no profiles/pics at all. What they have contributed to my life I consider a gift.
For those of us not blessed with a talent for writing, the profile can be a very intimidating task. I'm thankful for those that have reached out despite the fact that I have no pictures posted below the very limited amount of information contained in my profile. Not everyone can "wow" the masses with well chosen adjectives. Some of us need the forum that the chatroom provides. I'm a talker...not a writer.
Thanks for the chance to share my view.
~D~

[the sacred night]

I don't think the genital pics would affect my judgment much. I choose based on the info they provide about themselves, and then if there are pictures, I look to see if I find the person attractive or not, and I can tell at least somewhat if I am attracted to them no matter what body parts are pictured.

[Cman949]

If a person's profile had nothing but genital pics, I don't think that would bother me, so long as they had a interesting introduction that showed there was more to them than a penis. Most people on here, like myself, are still discovering themselves, so I don't really expect to see anything more than that, really. I actually kind of respect those who post face shots of themselves, since they seem more comfortable and confident in themselves. Though some of the genital shots can be pretty erotic if done right; and have made me wonder if I'd get more replies to my profile if I posted a few of my own.

Also, it's interesting to see the difference in responses to this thread between those who have posted pics on their profiles, including genital pics, and those who have not.

[smartsexychick]

I have an altered picture of my face, pictures of my breasts, a selection of tasteful erotic pictures from elsewhere that I found attractive, and a pretty hefty profile. I get TONS of pms in Chat (to the point that it is annoying when I am having a conversation with someone) and frequent letters, and 9 times out of 10, it is someone telling me that he or she or they love(s) my profile and my writing.

For me, what I want, it varies greatly. I have reached out to people based on geography because I wanted to learn more about where they are, US, Canada, and abroad. I have someone I have a connection with because her writing moves me. There is a woman with the most perfect breasts I have ever seen that make me crave her, in addition to her wonderful, sensual spirit. There is a man who has become a great friend and erotic cyber traveler because I was first attracted his gorgeous pubic hair. There is another man, whose journey has been like mine in terms of emerging from adversity, who has a well-written story and photos of his astounding beauty. However, the man I love most of all, my dear friend who I found here after I met him elsewhere, and this place has given us sanctuary and safety to meet and meet again, he has nothing on his page at all.

[Doggie_Wood]

There have been a number of people on line here that I have the great pleasure to have met in person.
And of those, I dearly love them all. That is not to say that we all have had sex together, individualy or collectivly. Of those I have met here, only one had cock/tit shots posted that I can remember, or was it two? :rolleyes: Yet I am in a 2 year + open relationship with another I met here. And have had intimate relations with several. But it wasn't a jump in the sack and have sex type of thing either. There was conciderable verbal intercourse prior to sexual intercourse. And . . . . .
I will be meeting others within the next few weeks - will they be sexual - who knows. The sexual part is not what is paramount to begin with. The bond of trust and honesty must be paramount for me to even think of being intimate with another person(s).
I had the flings early in life. You know - the "meat up, shack up and pack up" type of thing. And I was damned lucky I didn't contract something that would most surely regret today.
As others have said before me - there has to be some substance, some chemistry, some attraction - and not just of the bodily type.

So my answer would be some where between 0 and I don't think so.
However, the pics (some of them anyway) are nice to look at. :bigrin:

Doggie :doggie: